The Facts Machine

"And I come back to you now, at the turn of the tide"

Monday, June 16, 2003

Okay, I took a few days off. As I mentioned in my prior post, I have now relocated to Berkeley, and will be operating there until September.

This is my off-week before classes begin here, I have been treating it in a very vacation-y, "yay it's summer!" fashion. But I'll still try to be an active member of the "new media".

One of today's big stories appears to be a WashPost story on former National Security Council presidential aide Rand Beers, who is now A) working for John Kerry's campaign and B) has some interesting things to say about the Bushies' "war on terrah":
"The administration wasn't matching its deeds to its words in the war on terrorism. They're making us less secure, not more secure," said Beers, who until now has remained largely silent about leaving his National Security Council job as special assistant to the president for combating terrorism. "As an insider, I saw the things that weren't being done. And the longer I sat and watched, the more concerned I became, until I got up and walked out."

(snip)

"Counterterrorism is like a team sport. The game is deadly. There has to be offense and defense," Beers said. "The Bush administration is primarily offense, and not into teamwork."

In a series of interviews, Beers, 60, critiqued Bush's war on terrorism. He is a man in transition, alternately reluctant about and empowered by his criticism of the government. After 35 years of issuing measured statements from inside intelligence circles, he speaks more like a public servant than a public figure. Much of what he knows is classified and cannot be discussed. Nevertheless, Beers will say that the administration is "underestimating the enemy." It has failed to address the root causes of terror, he said. "The difficult, long-term issues both at home and abroad have been avoided, neglected or shortchanged and generally underfunded."

The focus on Iraq has robbed domestic security of manpower, brainpower and money, he said. The Iraq war created fissures in the United States' counterterrorism alliances, he said, and could breed a new generation of al Qaeda recruits. Many of his government colleagues, he said, thought Iraq was an "ill-conceived and poorly executed strategy."

"I continue to be puzzled by it," said Beers, who did not oppose the war but thought it should have been fought with a broader coalition. "Why was it such a policy priority?" The official rationale was the search for weapons of mass destruction, he said, "although the evidence was pretty qualified, if you listened carefully."
"evidence was pretty qualified" sounds pretty darn politie, if you ask me. Meanwhile, over the weekend Nicholas Kristof gets a bit closer to the point.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home