The Facts Machine

"And I come back to you now, at the turn of the tide"

Tuesday, March 09, 2004

Cheney vs Tenet on Iraqi intel:
CIA Director George Tenet on Tuesday rejected recent assertions by Vice President Dick Cheney that Iraq cooperated with the al-Qaida terrorist network and that the administration had proof of an illicit Iraqi biological warfare program.

Tenet's comments to the Senate Armed Services Committee are likely to fuel friction between the White House and intelligence agencies over the failure so far to find any of the banned weapons stockpiles that President Bush, in justifying his case for war, charged Saddam Hussein with concealing.

Tenet at first appeared to defend the administration, saying that he didn't believe the White House misrepresented intelligence provided by the CIA.

The administration's statements, he said, reflected a prewar intelligence consensus that Saddam had stockpiled chemical and biological weapons and was pursuing nuclear bombs.

But under sharp questioning by Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., Tenet reversed himself, saying there had been instances when he had warned administration officials that they were misstating the threat posed by Iraq.

"I'm not going to sit here and tell you what my interaction was ... and what I did and didn't do, except that you have to have confidence to know that when I believed that somebody was misconstruing intelligence, I said something about it," Tenet said. "I don't stand up publicly and do it."

Tenet admitted to Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, the committee's senior Democrat, that he had told Cheney that the vice president was wrong in saying that two truck trailers recovered in Iraq were "conclusive evidence" that Saddam had a biological weapons program.

Cheney made the assertion in a Jan. 22 interview with National Public Radio.
Lambert provides some much-needed snark, while Calpundit has some commentary.

One thing I'd add is that the dynamic between Tenet and Cheney is a problem for the administration, not only because they disagree, but because of the sides of the argument they're on. Remember, after Kay's "we were almost all wrong" revelations a while back, Bush conjured up a commission to look into how the CIA overhyped prewar intelligence on the threat posed by Iraq. These revelations -- though nothing all that new to those who have been paying attention -- cut against that narrative.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home