The Facts Machine

"And I come back to you now, at the turn of the tide"

Friday, March 07, 2003

MORAL CLARITY!
American military officials acknowledged yesterday that two prisoners captured in Afghanistan in December had been killed while under interrogation at Bagram air base north of Kabul – reviving concerns that the US is resorting to torture in its treatment of Taliban fighters and suspected al-Qa'ida operatives.

A spokesman for the air base confirmed that the official cause of death of the two men was "homicide", contradicting earlier accounts that one had died of a heart attack and the other from a pulmonary embolism.

The men's death certificates, made public earlier this week, showed that one captive, known only as Dilawar, 22, from the Khost region, died from "blunt force injuries to lower extremities complicating coronary artery disease" while another captive, Mullah Habibullah, 30, suffered from blood clot in the lung that was exacerbated by a "blunt force injury".

US officials previously admitted using "stress and duress" on prisoners including sleep deprivation, denial of medication for battle injuries, forcing them to stand or kneel for hours on end with hoods on, subjecting them to loud noises and sudden flashes of light and engaging in culturally humiliating practices such as having them kicked by female officers.

While the US claims this still constitutes "humane" treatment, human rights groups including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have denounced it as torture as defined by international treaty. The US has also come under heavy criticism for its reported policy of handing suspects over to countries such as Jordan, Egypt or Morocco, where torture techniques are an established part of the security apparatus. Legally, Human Rights Watch says, there is no distinction between using torture directly and subcontracting it out. (full story)
I recently had a discussion section where torture was the topic of discussion. A number of people in the class said that if America was using torture tactics, that they wouldn't want to know about it. I have to say, I disagree rather emphatically. I want to know about this. And certainly, whichever of our 250,000 men and women who are probably about to enter battle in Iraq would like to know what we're doing, especially if they end up POW's. We're America, the idea we've always been told is that we're supposed to be better than those who resort to such paleolithic tactics. Then again, we're spying on the UNSC, so why wouldnt we do this. Argh.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home